Which god is God? - Book Review

In Which God Is God?, Adrian J. Adams, Esq., provides a compelling investigation into the diverse ways human cultures define the divine. The central premise of the work is an exploration of whether any religion can validly claim to speak for God by applying the rigorous standards of legal evidence to spiritual claims. Rather than relying on simple summaries, Adams asks which traditions can substantiate their source of information with credible, relevant evidence.

The book examines a vast array of religious perspectives, from major world faiths like Hinduism, Judaism, and Islam to smaller traditions like Taoism and various branches of the New Age movement, including Raëlians and Wiccans. Adams contrasts these views by analyzing their differing concepts of spiritual authority, such as the personal, monotheistic God of the Judeo-Christian tradition versus the impersonal forces or "god-forces" described in Eastern philosophies. He further explores the nature of belief by distinguishing between faiths that view time as linear and those that believe in the cyclical nature of reincarnation.

Adams’s theoretical approach is uniquely grounded in the principles of courtroom evidence. He utilizes comparative religious study, historical analysis, and scriptural interpretation to evaluate "witness" testimony. For example, he uses the Federal Rules of Evidence to test whether religious founders possess "personal knowledge" or if their claims are merely speculative. By focusing on authentication methods—such as miracles and fulfilled prophecy—his research style shapes a narrative of rigorous inquiry without prematurely disclosing his final verdict on the question he poses.

This investigative style will likely resonate with readers interested in theology, comparative religion, or philosophical inquiry who appreciate a systematic approach to the "conflicts in religious claims". Conversely, the book may challenge readers with strict doctrinal commitments or those who are uncomfortable with subjecting long-held religious assumptions to "legal scrutiny".  Those who hold firm, exclusive beliefs about their own tradition may find parts of the discussion challenging or even unsettling. Adams’s willingness to question sacred assumptions is likely to provoke both admiration and discomfort.

Adams’s background as a lawyer (Esq.) provides the authority for this broad religious summation. His professional experience in resolving conflicts and his personal study of world religions contribute significant credibility to the work. By treating spiritual claims as cases to be tried, Adams offers a balanced and respectful survey that invites readers to weigh the evidence for themselves.